Vaccines In Modern Society - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1251 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/08/07 Category Medicine Essay Level High school Tags: Vaccines Essay Did you like this example? Vaccines have been around since Jenners success had spread throughout the world in the early 1800s. Jenner successfully created the small pox vaccine. When the word spread that there had been a successful small pox vaccine created, Massachusetts became the first state to persuade its residents to get the vaccine. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Vaccines In Modern Society" essay for you Create order After this vaccine had its success, creating vaccinations against deadly diseases became more common. When vaccinations became more common and states started enforcing them many people became upset and started the Anti-Vaxx movement. When the Anti-Vaxx movement was created parents started refusing to get their children vaccinated which ultimately lead to rare disease outbreaks. With the many outbreaks, I believe childhood vaccinations should be mandatory as they keep rare diseases at bay and protect those who are immunocompromised. Vaccinations not only protect your child, but they also protect loved ones, and other children. Vaccines work by developing your immunity against rare diseases by imitating an infection. After receiving a vaccination your body produces T-lymphocytes and antibodies against that virus. After the imitating infection has left your body, your body then remembers how to fight the disease you were vaccinated against. There two different types of vaccines, live vaccines and inactivated vaccines. Live vaccines contain a version of the living virus that has been weakened so that it does not cause serious disease in people with healthy immune systems (CDC, 2013). Inactivated vaccines are pathogens that have been destroyed so they are unable to replicate. Due to the vaccines being inactive they almost always require boosters in order for your body to develop immunity. Vaccines have many benefits that outweigh the risks. Since childhood vaccinations are such a highly controversial and debatable topic the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have listed some of the most important reasons for vaccinating your child. Reason one is they can save your childs life. Reason two is vaccines are safe and effective. Reason three vaccines protect others and the immunocompromised. Reason four they protect future generations. These four reasons the cdc has listed to get your child vaccinated are very important for you and your family to understand. Vaccines can save your childs life. When a child receives a vaccination, it builds their immunity against that virus. After receiving a vaccination, the body doesnt recognize the virus and their bodies begins creating antigens which ultimately builds their immunity. So, if your child is ever exposed to that virus their immune systems memory will remember how to fight that virus off without causing any harm. Vaccines are safe and effective. In order for a vaccine t o be used its thoroughly gets reviewed and tested by scientists and multiple professionals in the healthcare field. Vaccine development is a long, complex process, often lasting 10-15 years and involving a combination of public and private involvement (History of Vaccines, 2018). The vaccine testing and approval process consists of six different steps. Once those six steps are successfully completed then the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is responsible for regulating vaccines in the United States (cdc, 2015). Exploratory Stage Pre-Clinical Stage Clinical Development Regulatory review and approval Manufacturing Quality Control Vaccines protect others and the immunocompromised. Vaccines protect those who are too young to receive them due to infancy and protects those who are unable to be vaccinated due to medical reasons. Vaccines are among the most effective tools available for preventing infectious diseases and their complications and sequelae (Omer, Saad 2007). Due to individuals being too young or those who are unable to receive vaccines it is our job to vaccinate those who are eligible in order to keep rare diseases at bay. Keeping rare diseases at bay allows those individuals to live without the fear of contracting a potentially deadly virus. Â  Vaccinations will protect future generations from the diseases that we have today. Just like we are protected from small pox, measles, and polio. Smallpox vaccination eradicated that disease worldwide. Your children dont have to get smallpox shots anymore because the disease no longer exists anywhere in the world (cdc, 2017). With the increase in the anti-vaxx movement there has been an increase in measles cases. With having these sporadic measles outbreaks, overall it is not protecting the future generations. Even with the supporting evidence as to why and how vaccines protect us, there are still many people that are very skeptical about vaccines. Which many of these people choose to either delay or not vaccinate at all. When people started receiving the small pox vaccine that is when concern grew about vaccinations and not long after is when the anti-vaxx movement began. Today many individuals believe in the anti-vaxx movement. These people think completely opposite of those who believe in vaccinations. They believe that receiving vaccinations does more harm than good to their children. There are many reasons as to why people think vaccines are harmful, for example they believe that the ingredients in vaccines are dangerous, causes autism, and a violation of parental rights. Even though vaccines take years to make and get approved people believe that the ingredients that vaccines contain such as thimerosal, formaldehyde, neomycin, and aluminum are dangerous to the human body. These ingredients all have different purposes in creating a vaccine. Even though these ingredients themselves in large quantities are dangerous the tiny amount in a single vaccine does not cause any harm to the human body. Before vaccines are released to be used The Food and Drug Administration looks at the results of these tests to decide whether to license the vaccine for use in the United States (vaccines.gov, 2017). Another reason is people believe that the MMR shot causes autism. Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his infamous article in The Lancet linking autism with the MMR vaccine, causing a public outcry against all childhood vaccinations (McLeod, Corinne 2014). Years later we are still seeing the repercussion of this article. After years of people believing Wakefields study, research has shown that his study was wrong in many ways and ended up being removed in 2010. With the many studies done studies have shown that there is no link between receiving vaccines and developing ASD (cdc, 2015). The third reason is people believe that its a violation of parental rights. Many schools have strict school vaccine requirements. All states permitted medical exemptions from school immunization requirements, 48 states allowed religious exemptions, and 21 states allowed exemptions based on philosophical or personal beliefs (Omer, Saad 2007). With those being the three big reasons why people dont agree with vaccinations the vaccination rate is decreasing. The anti-vaxx movement is dangerous in many ways. With the vaccination rates decreasing there has been multiple recent rare disease outbreaks such as the measles virus. These outbreaks are among persons who refused vaccinations and are spread rapidly within the unvaccinated populations (Omar Saad, 2007). With more people choosing not to vaccinate this leads the potential to start seeing more rare diseases. With vaccinations being such a hot and controversial topic in the United States, there are two different views on them such as pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine. Those who believe in pro-vaccine believe that the benefits outweigh the risks and its doing more good for their child than harming them. People who are anti-vaccine believe that vaccines are doing more harm than protecting them since they have dangerous ingredients and side effects such as the MMR vaccine causing autism. I personally am pro-vaccine. I believe that the benefits of vaccines outweigh the risks tremendously. Our job as a whole is to educate the importance of vaccinations and how they protect us.

Harlem Children s Zone Promise Academy Essay - 1348 Words

Every student must have an equal opportunity to free, fair, equitable, and rigorous education. As educators we must strive to provide students with the best education we possibly can as teachers, community members, administration and policy makers. In order to provide equitable education all learners must be taken into consideration when designing curriculum, lessons, courses and school structure. Harlem Children’s Zone Promise Academy II high school is a charter school in the middle of Harlem, New York. The students come from areas all over the five boroughs and even New Jersey to become a part of the HCZ organization. The school promises that if the students stay in school they will graduate and go to college. Students and parents will go to great lengths to win the lottery system that allows them entry to the school. In the school each classroom has a smart board with speakers that is positioned in front center of the room. The teachers are outfitted with a MacBook laptop t hat they can travel with and hook up to the smart board. These computers are equipped with smart notebook, which allows them to write on slides, insert videos, graphs and even games. Teachers use Google Drive to upload lesson plans, documents and materials into a shared folder. Each classroom has a bookshelf full of text books pertaining to the main teachers subject. Some books are Advanced Placement and some for Regents material. There are teacher editions and even DVDs for resources in theShow MoreRelatedEducational Leaders And Public Policymakers4023 Words   |  17 PagesChild- Parent Centers indicate that children who attended preschool were comparatively ahead in early reading and math skills (Barnett M. N., 2013). Similar studies have also revealed that depending upon various factors; such as preschool quality, social class and race, educational boost can continue through K-12 and well into adulthood. Various studies have shown that high-quality preschool saves schools and states money, and provide long-term benefits to children and communities (Magnuson, 2013;

Business Capstone Project Coca Cola Amatil

Question: Chapter 1 (4-5pages) Introduction: From Assignment 01 include: Your business research topic. What is your topic and what is its business significance. A brief background/literature discussion of your topic. Provide a list of research questions for the identified business problem or opportunity. A brief description of the research methodologies and techniques to be used for the research project. What research methodology will you use? A description of the research process. What will be the steps in your project? Outline describing what will be in each chapter of the report. Chapter 2 (8-12 pages)Literature Review: From Assignment 02 include: Introduction to Literature Review: Start with introduction which includes a list of the topic you will do a literature review on, what your hypotheses are from these topics that you are starting out with. Topic 1: Define your 1st key word or phrase. Provide strengths and weaknesses from literature about the topic. Provide at least 4 references. Analyse your hypothesis about this topic and discuss your conclusion. Topic 2. Define your 2ndkey word or phrase. Provide strengths and weaknesses from literature about the topic. Provide at least 4 references. Analyse your hypothesis about this topic and discuss your conclusion. Topic 3: Define your 3rdkey word or phrase. Provide strengths and weaknesses from literature about the topic. Provide at least 4 references. Analyse your hypothesis about this topic and discuss your conclusion. Topic 4: Define your 4thword or phrase. Provide strengths and weaknesses from literature about the topic. Provide at least 4 references. Analyse your hypothesis about this topic and discuss your conclusion. Conclusion to Literature Review Chapter 3 (6-8 pages)Data Collection and Analysis Introduction to Data Collection and Analysis Data Sampling Method. How will you get the data you need to test your hypotheses? What tools or devices will you use to make or record observations?How will you choose the sample? What degree of accuracy or level of confidence can you guarantee? Data Analysis. What combinations of analytical and statistical process will be applied to the data?Which of these will allow you to accept or reject your hypotheses? Conclusion to Data Collection and Analysis Chapter 4 (3-5 pages)Discussion of Results Discussion on Hypotheses. Was your initial hypothesis supported or rejected? Why? Discussion on Literature and Research Results. What are the implications of your findings for the theory base, for the background assumptions, or relevant literature? Recommendations. What recommendations result from the work? Chapter 5 (1-2 pages)Conclusion and Future Work Conclusion: Brief summary connecting your business research topic to your research results Future Work: What suggestions can you make for further research on this topic? Answer: Introduction Business Research Topic Employee empowerment is the mean of providing some degree of autonomy and responsibility to the employees in terms of allowing them organizational decision-making process (Fernandez and Moldogaziev 2013). It allows organizational decision to be made at lower level, where employees face unique view of problems in organization. Empowered employees have their potential to reach at high level of productivity with the feeling of control in their job. Key ingredient in employee empowerment is solid support system, which minimizes the complexity level of the job faced by employees (Appelbaum et al. 2015). It in turn increases organizational performance. However, with the intension of increasing profit, organizations are more focused on giving less flexibility to the employees and surrounding them with strict policies. Empowered employees are more likely to embrace organizational change initiated towards the growth of the organization. A sense of being valued would lead the employees to accommodate quickly with coming changes of the organization. In such situation, organization should keep constant and open communication with the employees regarding the rationality of the changes (Men and Stacks 2013). The feel of comfortable exchanging of ideas fosters teamwork in the organization. These teamwork activities ultimately increase organizational productivity through shared workload. Collaboration often allows employees to achieve much more than any one employee can achieve individually. Empowered employees are also less likely to leave organization and thereby, reduce employee turnover in the organization. The organization chosen for the research is Coca Cola Amatil, which is one of the largest bottlers of non-alcoholic beverages in Asia-Pacific. After 2014, it has been found that the leaders of Coco-Cola Amatil are demonstrating poor leadership (Ghosh 2013). They do not provide any rewards and recognition for their career pathways. Apart from that, the organization do not allow them in any major decision making process. This system is gradually decreasing the employee morale and employee productivity. This research will evaluate the impact of employee empowerment on the performance level of Coca Cola Amatil. Organizational Background Coca Cola Amatil is the largest bottler in Asia Pacific Region, who deals with diverse group of businesses. The organization operates in six countries including Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Samoa. The products of this organization include Coca Cola, Coca Cola Zero, Diet Coke, Sprite, Sprite Zero, Nestea, baked beans and canned tomatoes. As per the financial report of 2015, the organization has increased its revenue by 3.1 % (Ccamatil.com 2016). Excellent customer service has led the organization to earn enhanced organizational reputation and more profit. The financial report of 2015 has demonstrated an organization profit of A$79.9 million (Ccamatil.com 2016). Significance of the study The significance of the study lies upon emphasizing on the employee empowerment strategy of Coca Cola Amatil. The organization has been holding its reputation in the market through providing unique taste of beverage food. Inventing unique taste for the beverage foods needs incorporation of unique ideas from the part of employees (Namasivayam, Guchait and Lei 2014). Therefore, identifying employee empowerment strategy in extremely important to assess the overall organization performance of the organization. This research will also be emphasized on identifying solution for the issues related to employee empowerment in Coca Cola Amatil. Background of the study Employee empowerment is the most frequent topic of discussion about an organization because of its effect in overall organizational performance. Empowerment is given to the employees through providing them some authority in terms of sharing their opinion in organizational development process. Empowered employees have enough control over their job role and enthusiasm to accomplish those job roles. True and honest appreciation from the part of management let the employee to realize that hard work is actually valued (Elloy 2012). Therefore, employees are more encouraged to increase their productivity level and thereby increase overall organizational performance. Empowerment enables the employees to work independently by allowing them to apply their own knowledge and skills (Backhaus 2014). It enhances both personal and organizational success. Todays employees are more conscious about the value they get from their superiors than the benefit they get. However, most of the employers try to make the employees happy with monetary rewards. They are more concerned about compensate employees with monetary rewards than giving them some level of authority (Zeglat, Aljaber and Alrawabdeh 2014). However, only monetary rewards make employees partially happy, but if they are not provided with enough value, then they cannot be fully happy. Therefore, along with providing monetary rewards, organization should enough level of autonomy to the employees. The sense of freedom and work flexibility would make them enthusiastic to solve complex organizational issues in simple way. To begin with employee empowerment, organizations should value the employees as the part of their organization. Empowered employees always have authority to make decision without their supervisors. Employees, who are confident that their inputs will be valued by the organization, will more likely to share their innovative ideas towards organizational success. Empowered employees are more likely to provide exceptional customer service through open communication with them. In this way, it increases customer equity value and organizational reputation. Nevertheless, some organizations are now focused on earning more profit by overloading employee with works. Coca Cola Amatil is the most popular beverage organization in the Asia Pacific Region, but recently it is shifting from its employee empowerment strategy (Gazzoli, Hancer and Park 2012). The leaders of the organization are running autocratic leadership and always command on the work process of the employees. The employees are not getting enough space for showing their creativity. It has decreased the productivity level of the employees to an extreme level. Research Aims The aim of the research is to identify the impact of employee empowerment strategy on the overall organizational performance of Coca Cola Amatil. Research Objectives To identify the impact of employee empowerment strategy on overall organizational performance To evaluate the employee empowerment strategy in Coca Cola Amatil To examine the issues related to implementation of employee empowerment strategy in Coca Cola Amatil To provide suggestions for improving employee empowerment strategy in Coca Cola Amatil Research Questions What is the impact of employee empowerment strategy on overall organizational performance? What are the employee empowerment strategies in Coca Cola Amatil? What are the issues faced by Coca Cola Amatil, while implementing employee empowerment strategy? How employee empowerment strategies of Coca Cola Amatil can be improved? Research Methodology and Techniques This research study will be conducted through primary data collection method. Survey and interview strategy will be chosen for collecting authentic information regarding the research topic. In the survey method, information will be collected from chosen respondents. Survey questionnaires will be provided to the respondents and the respondent will provide their views according to the survey questionnaires. In the interview method, face-to-face interview will be arranged with the organizational heads for getting accurate organizational strategy. From the views of organizational heads, various empowerment suggestions will be drown out towards increases organizational performance. Random sampling technique will be applied for collect data from the respondents. In case of secondary data collection technique, various authentic journals, websites and books will be used for collecting relevant information of the research topic. In order to analyze collected data, statistical analysis techniq ue will be applied in this research study. Research Process Figure 1: Research Process (Source: Created by Author) Outline of the Research Study Chapter 1: Introduction: Research objectives and questions will be set for the research study in this chapter. Apart from that, this chapter will also provide background and significance of the research study. Chapter 2: Literature Review: This chapter will provide relevant information regarding the topic of the research. Information will be collected from various relevant and authentic journals, websites and books. Chapter 3: Data collection and Analysis: In this chapter, effective research methods will be chosen for gathering authentic information for the research topic. Effective research method will enhance the quality of research outcome. Chapter 4: Discussion of Results: In this chapter, accurate information will be extracted through research methodology. This chapter will convert general information to specific information. Chapter 5: Conclusion and Future Work: This chapter will be related to brief description about the research findings. Moreover, this chapter will also emphasize on future work to be accomplished in enhancing research quality. Chapter 2: Literature Review Introduction This chapter will define the topics that are most relevant for accomplishing the research. The topics that have been selected for this research are organizational creativity, employee performance, employee motivation and financial stability. This chapter will introduce each of the topics and identify the strengths and weakness. Against each of the topics, hypothesis has been formulated. With the explanation of each of the topics, relevancy with hypothesis will be justified at the end. Set of Hypotheses Hypothesis Set 1 H0: Employee empowerment has no impact on organizational creativity H1: Employee empowerment has huge impact on organizational creativity Hypothesis Set 2 H0: Employee empowerment has no impact on employee performance H1: Employee empowerment has great impact on employee performance Hypothesis Set 3 H0: Employee empowerment has no impact on employee motivation H1: Employee empowerment has impact on employee motivation Hypothesis Set 4 H0: Employee empowerment has no impact on financial stability of organization H1: Employee empowerment has huge impact on financial stability of organization Topic 1: Employee Empowerment on Organizational Creativity Definition and Theories Organizational creativity captures new ideas and knowledge towards transforming organizational design and organizational dynamics. The prime aspect of organizational creativity is to provide new insights to the employee for getting out of traditional organizational process. Another aspect of organizational creativity is to add some new perspective towards increasing organizational performance. According to Murari and Gupta (2012), organizational creativity provides innovative spirit to the employees for increasing overall organizational performance. On the other hand, Kim, Losekoot and Milne (2013) opined that creativity is all about learning the association between inner creative power and outer creative power of employees. The more employees have creative ideas in their mind, the more organization can bring creativity in their organizational process. However, the employees should be allowed in organizational decision-making process so that they can share their innovative ideas towa rds improving organizational performance. On the other hand, while organization is goes to adopt new and creative processes, some employees may be resistant to accommodate those processes. In such situation, providing enough rewards and recognition to the employees may help them in adopting creative organizational process. Herzberg motivation theory defines the two types motivational factors namely hygiene factor and motivational factor, which led them to share creative ideas and adopt creative ideas in the organizational process. According to Zeffane and Al Zarooni (2012), hygiene factors are defined in terms of proper pay, comfortable workplace condition, interpersonal relationship and status. According to the previous researcher, while the employees get comfortable workplace condition within the organization, then they can more concentrate on looking into work from different perspectives. Thus, they can bring creativity in their job roles. While, organization tries to incorporate some creative organizational processes towards increasing overall organizational performance, supporting employees is the best effort towards making employee acquainted with new process. On the other hand, Zhang et al. (2014) opined that motivational factors are related to recognition and growth opportunities. While employe es will have high sense of value, they will be highly interested to contribute towards organizational creativity. Figure 2: Herzberg motivation Model (Source: Pentareddy and Suganthi 2015) Strength and Weakness According to Phipps, Prieto and Ndinguri (2013) organizational creativity leads to incorporate new ideas and knowledge towards bringing innovation. It increases growth option and market share of the organization. On the other hand, Chiang and Hsieh (2012) opined that empowering employees in sharing creative ideas often solve complex problems occurred in organization. Therefore, organization can go further towards new development process by increasing its performance. It has been found that, Goodman Fielderin Australia openly allows employees in decision-making process. Thus, the organization overall organizational productivity has been increased by 39% by the year of 2014 from the year 2009 (Wong and Laschinger 2013). However, some weaknesses of employee empowerment on organizational creativity can be found in some extents. According to Taylor (2013), allowing too much employees in decision-making process may create biasness in overall decision-making process. On the other hand, Lati f et al. (2013) pointed out that empowerment may also mislead the behavior of employees, which can decrease organizational performance. From the above discussion, it can be said allowing capable and talented employees in organizational decision-making process bring creative ideas towards increasing organizational performance. Therefore, it can be said that the topic, organizational creativity, is appropriate for conducting the research. Impact of employee empowerment on employee performance Definition of Theory Employee empowerment comes when employees are given sufficient freedom, trust, power and autonomy for accomplishing their job-related task. Employee performance is defined in terms of the activities expected of a particular employee and how well they have accomplished those activities. According to Maynard, Gilson and Mathieu (2012), performance of the employees is increased in proportion to the values provided to the employees in their workplace. While, employees are provided with high sense of pride and ownership of work, they become more enthusiastic in accomplishing their job duties as per the organizational standards. On the other hand, Hempel Zhang and Han (2012) opined that a sense of achievement offered by management to the employees empower them to be more productive towards organizational success. McClelland theory defines three needs of the employee which management are to fulfill for empowering them towards increasing organizational performance. According to (Barrick et al. 2015), employees seeking high desire of achievement tend to perform at their peak to demonstrate their capability. However, these employees tend to stay at moderate situation by avoiding low risk and high risk. On other hand, Sun et al. (2012) opined that need of power or authority inspires the employees to work more towards organizational success so that they can be influential and effective in their workplace. Furthermore, Zhang and Zhou (2014) suggested that high need of affiliation drive the employees to perform activities that enhance interpersonal relationship. Therefore, they perform better client interaction and customer service. This ultimately leads to increased organizational performance. Figure 3: McClellands Theory of Needs (Source: Kim and Kim 2013) Strength and Weakness According to Shuck and Reio (2014), increases in individual employee performance have great influence on overall organizational performance. Employee empowerment provides enough support and high value to the employees for accomplishing complex task. On the other hand, Kmieciak Michna and Meczynska (2012) opined that the employees could also be motivated towards better organizational performance through providing lucrative promotional opportunity. However, weakness of empowerment on employee performance can be seen in the extent, where the employees wrongfully utilize the power given to them. From the above discussion, it can be said that empowering employees through high sense of value and promotional opportunity leads them to increase their performance level. Therefore, the chosen topic for hypothesis, employee performance, is appropriate for this research. Impact of employee empowerment on employee motivation Definition and Theory According to Michel, Kavanagh and Tracey (2013), employee empowerment has positive impact on employee motivation and lead to better organizational performance. Empowerment provides strong feeling of self-control and influential. The autonomy of choosing own work process increases the sense of responsibility of the employees. It creates confidence within employees and thereby, they can perform their job in a better way towards organizational success. On the other hand, Luoh, Tsaur and Tang (2014) opined that appreciation, flexible work environment and meaningful work not only increases employee enthusiasm level, but also increases employee commitment and employee creativity. Empowered employees tend to show special attention and accuracy in their job role. It has been found that Dick Smith Foods in Australia offers lucrative promotional opportunity to the employees on achievement of some specific goals within particular period (Camps and Lunaà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ Arocas 2012). In this way, t he organization has become successful in increasing the overall organizational performance through individual employee performance (Manzoor 2012). Maslows Need Hierarchy defines the hierarchical needs of the employees, which needs to be fulfilled for increased employee motivation. In the psychological need, managers require to provide comfortable work environment and sufficient breaks to the employees so that they can survive in the workplace. In the safety need, managers require to provide enough job security to the employees. While, the employees would feel secure in their job, they would better concentrate on their job and increase their performance level. In social need, managers are to create harmonious relationship among the employees to foster teamwork in the workplace. Effective teamwork ultimately increases employee productivity through accomplishing work with high sense of togetherness (Rahmdel and Rahmdel 2013). In self-esteem need, managers need to recognize the talented employees for their contribution in organizational success. A sense of recognition would lead the employees to achieve organizational performance i n better ways as per the standard of the organization (Hyland, Lee and Mills 2015). In self-actualization need, organizational managers require to provide opportunity to the employee for achieving their full potential. Figure 4: Maslows Need Hierarchy Model (Source: Ghosh 2013) Strength and Weakness According to Maynard et al. (2013), increasing level of motivation provided to the employees ultimately encourages the employees towards better productivity. On the other hand, Taylor (2013) opined that proper employee evaluation and recognition is the key ingredient of increased organizational performance. However, weakness of employee motivation is laid in lack of leaders ability to manage the employees. From the above discussion, it can be said that proper employee motivation through successful leadership can ultimately lead employees towards increasing organizational performance. Therefore, it can be said that the topic, employee motivation, is appropriate for conducting the research. Impact of financial stability on organization Definition and Theory According to Pantouvakis and Bouranta (2013), financial stability is one of the core aspects of an organization, as based on it the firm is able to develop its future capabilities. The management of large amount of money is known as finance (Su, Baird and Blair 2013). However, for a firm it becomes quite difficult to make a concrete analysis for future development through financial stability. Stability for an organization can only be achieved if the resources are segregated properly among the several dimensions of management (Wu and Chen 2014). For being stable, finance helps in upgrading the present scenario of an organization and helps in developing the human resource through several rewards and recognition. Figure 5: Financial Stability Model (Source: Garca-Morales et al. 2012) Strengths and weakness According to Shaw, Park and Kim (2013), financial stability helps in progressing the research, time and knowledge through significant decision-making considerations. In this way, an organization is able to stabilize its optimum asset usage. On the other hand, Van De Voorde, Paauwe and Van Veldhoven (2012) pointed out that while identifying the financial stability considerations, firms fail to predict the future prospects. This leads to poor financial management and ultimately employees are to face huge distresses. Shahzad et al. (2012) highlighted the fact that while an organization fails to stabilize the financial factors, it ties to reduce expenses by eliminating human resource. This creates and bad impact on the minds of employees. Therefore, from the above discussion, it can be said that financial stability has a direct impact on the organizational performance. Thus, if the employees are empowered through effective financial considerations, then surely they will be satisfied to perform better. Therefore, it can be said that the topic, financial stability, is appropriate for conducting the research. Conclusion While concluding it can be said that the four factors, organization creativity, employee performance, employee motivation and financial stability has direct impact on the organizational performance. From the discussion, it has been also found that employee empowerment has positive impact on each of the factors. If the employees are empowered and they are motivated, then surely the organization will perform better. Literature review gave the idea of each of the factors that will be necessary for developing the research. Questionnaires will be developed further considering these factors. Chapter 3: Data Collection and Analysis Introduction Research methodology is the sequential process for conducting the any research study. This chapter will introduce data sampling method through various data collection techniques and sampling techniques. Apart from that, this chapter will also introduce data analysis techniques to be used in evaluated the data collected from the respondents. Data Sampling Method Research Approach Research approach helps in collecting authentic information about the topic of the research. Inductive and deductive approach can be applied to gather authentic data. In case of inductive approach, new theories and models are needed to create for gathering accurate information of the research study. On the other side, in case of deductive approach, exiting theories and models can be applied to gather relevant regarding the topic of the research Farrokhyar et al. (2014). These theories and models can be applied to critically evaluate the research study for getting quality output. Deductive approach has beenchosen for this research study, as it consumes less time in completing the research study. Apart from that, it will also perfectly maintain the budget constraint of the research study. Research Design Research design assists in selecting appropriate method to be chosen for conducting the research study. Three types of research methods can be applied for conducting research study namely explanatory, exploratory and descriptive research design. Explanatory research design helps in identifying various research variables and the interdependency of those research variables upon each other. Interdependency of research variables assists in constructing suitable research questions and thereby, coming up with appropriate recommendation. Descriptive research approach assists in analyzing exact purpose of research study (Dumay and Cai 2015). This research purpose depicts the usefulness of the research study. On the other hand, explanatory research design identifies the relationship among different research variables. It also identifies the background of the research study. Explanatory research design has been chosen for the conducting this research study. It identifies the relationship among different variables of research study and thereby, enhances the quality of research output. Research Tools Effective research strategy assists in gathering most relevant information for conducting research study. Four types of research strategies can be applied in data gathering namely case study, focus group, survey and interview. Case study and focus group are used to gather secondary information from secondary sources (Zink 2012). This research study is dependent on interview and survey method, which are required for primary data collection. In these two methods, responses are collected from the selected respondents, which provide relevant information regarding the research topic. Data Collection Method Primary data collection method has been selected for this research study to collect authentic information. However, both primary as well as secondary data sources have been used to collect relevant information. In case of secondary data sources, websites, authentic journals and books have been used to collect data. On the other hand, in primary data collection, quantitative and qualitative techniques have been applied to gather data. In quantitative technique, data has been collected from the respondents through applying survey strategy (MacDonald 2012). Survey questionnaires have been provided to the respondents for getting authentic information about the research topic. On the other hand, in qualitative technique, information has been accumulated from the respondent through arranging interview with them. Sample Selection 50 employees of Coca Cola Amatil have been selected for the quantitative data collection technique. On the other hand, 3 managers have been selected for conducting qualitative data collection technique. Sampling Technique Simple random sampling technique has been chosen for this study to collect information from the respondents. In this sampling technique, respondents have been surveyed as per the convenience of the respondents. Data Analysis Technique Data analysis technique assists analyzing the collected data through appropriate analytical tools. Statistical analysis has been used for this research study to analyze the collected data. It has helped in converting the general information to specific information and thereby, it has enhanced the quality of research outcome (Zink 2012). In statistical data analysis, mean, median and mode have been selected to evaluate collected data. In this way, it allowed in accepting and rejecting the hypotheses set for the research study. 5-point Liker Scale has been utilized for conducting data analysis. Conclusion This chapter has introduced the research tools and techniques to be applied in collecting authentic information regarding the research topic. The application of various data collection techniques and sampling techniques has been described in this chapter. Apart from that, statistical analytical tools have been discussed here for evaluating the collected data. Chapter 4: Discussion of Results Discussion on Hypothesis Quantitative Questions Questionnaire 1: Service Tenure How long are you working in Coca Cola Amatil? Options No of response Response (%) Total respondents 0-1 Year 14 28% 50 1-2 Years 16 32% 50 2-3 Years 10 20% 50 3-4 Years 6 12% 50 4-5 Years 4 8% 50 Table 1: Service Tenure (Source: Created by Author) From the table, it can be identified that 60% of the employees are working for not more than 2 years. 32% of the employees are working within 1 to 2 years, which indicate that the organization is not able to retain its employees. Perhaps the employee empowerment may be the factor that is lacking in the organization, which will be further evaluated and justified in the following questionnaires. Figure 6: Service Tenure (Source: Created by Author) Questionnaire 2: Evaluation of Hypothesis set 1 How far do you agree that your creative ideas are valued by your organization? Options No of response Response (%) Total respondents Strongly agreed 5 10 50 Agreed 9 18 50 Neutral 4 8 50 Disagreed 19 38 50 Strongly disagreed 13 26 50 Mean Median Mode SD 3.52 4 4 1.328495 Table 2: Valuing Creative Ideas (Source: Created by Author) From the table, it can be found that mean value is 3.52. This indicates that 38%of the respondents are conflicting with 26% of the respondents. It can be also said that maximum response is on the negative side of the question. Therefore, it can be said that the organization does not value employee decisions and their creativity. This implies that employee empowerment is lacking in the organization. This result has been supported by SD value, which is 1.328494. The value is more than 1, indicating risk for the organization. Finally, it can be said that null hypothesis (H0: Employee empowerment has no impact on organizational creativity) is rejected. Figure 7: Valuing Creative Ideas (Source: Created by Author) Questionnaire 3: Evaluation of Hypothesis set 2 How far do you agree that employee empowerment in your organization is sufficient to increase your performance level? Options No of response Response (%) Total respondents Strongly agreed 8 16 50 Agreed 10 20 50 Neutral 3 6 50 Disagreed 17 34 50 Strongly disagreed 12 24 50 Mean Median Mode SD 3.3 4 4 1.446318 Table 3: Sufficiency of empowerment strategy (Source: Created by Author) From the table, it can be found that mean value is 3.3. This indicates that 6% of the respondents are conflicting with 24% of the respondents. It can be also said that maximum response (58%) is on the negative side of the question. Therefore, it can be said that in the organization,employee empowerment activities are not sufficient. The performance level of the employees is extremely low. This indicates that employee empowerment is not adequate in the organization. This result has been backed by SD value, which is 1.446318. The value is more than 1, indicating risk for the organization. Finally, it can be said that null hypothesis (H0: Employee empowerment has no impact on employee performance) is rejected. Figure 8: Sufficiency of empowerment strategy (Source: Created by Author) Questionnaire 4: Evaluation of Hypothesis set 3 Are you satisfied with the motivational strategies of your organization? Options No of response Response (%) Total respondents Highly satisfied 5 10 50 Satisfied 8 16 50 Neutral 4 8 50 Dissatisfied 15 30 50 Highly dissatisfied 18 36 50 Mean Median Mode SD 3.66 4 5 1.379293 Table 4: Satisfaction with Motivational Strategies (Source: Created by Author) From the table, it can be found that mean value is 3.66. This indicates that 30% of the respondents is conflicting with 36% of the respondents. It can be also said that maximum response (66%) is on the negative side of the question. Therefore, it can be said that in the organization, motivational activities are not adequate in number. In this organization, employee motivation is not supported by employee empowerment. This indicates that employee empowerment is not adequate in the organization. This result has been backed by SD value, which is 1.379293. The value is more than 1, indicating risk for the organization. Finally, it can be said that null hypothesis (H0: Employee empowerment has no impact on employee motivation) is rejected. Figure 9: Satisfaction with Motivational Strategies (Source: Created by Author) Questionnaire 5: Evaluation of Hypothesis set 4 How far do you agree that your organization is financially stable in respect to employee performance? Options No of response Response (%) Total respondents Strongly agreed 6 12 50 Agreed 8 16 50 Neutral 2 4 50 Disagreed 19 38 50 Strongly disagreed 15 30 50 Mean Median Mode SD 3.58 4 4 1.386377 Table 5: Financial Stability in Respect to Employee Performance (Source: Created by Author) From the table, it can be found that mean value is 3.58. This indicates that 38% of the respondent is conflicting with 30% of the respondents. It can be also said that maximum response (68%) is on the negative side of the question. Therefore, it can be said that the organization is not financially stable currently. Had there been financial stability, then surely amount of employee retention would have increased. Perhaps if there would have been financial stability, then employee empowerment activities could have been possible. This result has been backed by SD value, which is 1.386377. The value is more than 1, indicating risk for the organization. Finally, it can be said that null hypothesis (H0: Employee empowerment has no impact on financial stability of organization) is rejected. Figure 10: Financial Stability in Respect to Employee Performance (Source: Created by Author) Questionnaire 6: Recommendation determination In your opinion, which empowerment strategy would be helpful in increasing employee performance? Options No of response Response (%) Total respondents Allowing employee in decision-making process 16 32 50 Providing Support 5 10 50 Appropriate Recognition 10 20 50 Promotional opportunity 8 16 50 Providing Autonomy 11 22 50 Mean Median Mode SD 2.86 3 1 1.565052 Table 6: Empowerment Strategy (Source: Created by Author) From the above table, it can be identified that mean value is 2.86, which indicates 20% of the respondents are conflicting with 22% (providing autonomy). On the other hand, mode value is 32%, which indicates maximum response towards Allowing employee in decision-making process. Out of these three activities, it is quite confirm that the employees are extremely de-motivated. As employees are not entertained for decision making process hence employee empowerment is not achieved. This is a risk for the organization as SD value is more than 1. Figure 11: Empowerment Strategy (Source: Created by Author) Qualitative Question Question 1: Do you think employees are empowered in your organization in terms of decision making? As a response to this question, the manager indicated that employees are not considered as the part of decision-making process. From here, it can be understood that there has been a gap between the organizational decision and employee expectation. The employees are not valued in the organization and their decision is not granted. Thus, finally, it can be said that employees are de-motivated and not empowered in their entire tenure. Discussion on literature and Research Result Discussion with regards to Questionnaire 1 In the literature review, it has been found that if the employees are not motivated they cannot perform. One way to motivate employees is by empowering them. Here, it has been found that the organization is not able to retain its employees for more than 2 years. Thus, it needs to follow employee empowerment theories for retaining experienced employees. Discussion with regards to Questionnaire 2 From the Questionnaire 2, it has been identified that the median value is 4, which indicates that there is a scope of improving the 38% negative response towards positive. If the organization follows the Herzberg theory that has been described in the literature review section then it will be able to increase organizational performance. While considering the result, it is clear that the employees can be motivated if they are empowered. Discussion with regards to Questionnaire 3 From the Questionnaire 3, it has been identified that the median value is 4, which indicates that there is a scope of improving the 34% negative response towards positive. The organization has to follow McClelland theory that has been described in the literature review section. This will help in developing employee empowerment in the organization. Discussion with regards to Questionnaire 4 From the Questionnaire 3, it has been identified that the median value is 4, which indicates that there is a scope of improving the 30% negative response towards positive. The organization has to follow Maslows Need Hierarchy theory for motivating the employees. If the employees are made the part of decision-making process then they will be empowered. Discussion with regards to Questionnaire 5 From the Questionnaire 3, it has been identified that the median value is 4, which indicates that there is a scope of improving the 38% negative response towards positive. The organization has to follow financial stability so that they can reduce the burden from the employees. Discussion with regards to Questionnaire 6 From the Questionnaire 3, it has been identified that the median value is 3, which indicates that there is a scope of improving the 20% negative response towards positive. The organization has to follow the theories in literature review section so that risk pertaining in the organization is reduced. Recommendations Allowing employees in organizational decision making process Coca Cola Amatil should allow its employees in its decision-making process for providing them sense of value in the workplace. It will definitely boost employee morale and make them more enthusiastic towards greater productivity. Employee Autonomy Employees always like to have some level of freedom their workplace and try to control their job by their own. Therefore, the manager of Coca Cola Amatil should delegate some authority to the employees regarding their job role. It will increase the responsibility of the employees towards their work and surely increase employee performance. Employee Support Often, complex work given to the employees may reduce their performance level. In such situation, the leaders of Coca Cola Amatil should provide enough level of support to the employees. It will minimize the complexity level faced by the employees in their job. Thus, employee performance will be enhanced. Chapter 5: Conclusion and Future work Conclusion While concluding the study, it can be said that employee empowerment the level of autonomy provided to the employees in the workplace. Employee empowerment ultimately increases the organizational performance by allowing employees in decision-making process and getting innovative ideas from them. Though Coca Cola Amatil is successful in operating their business, it is concerned about the employee empowerment. Therefore, the employees are not enthusiastic in to increase their productivity level, which ultimately reducing the overall organizational performance. The employees of this organization are not at all satisfied with the existing empowerment strategy. Therefore, the organization should allow its employees in decision-making process and delegate some level of authority to the employees. Future work Research time and budget was short for conducting this research study. Therefore, investigation of too much information from the respondents was a kind of constraint for the research study. In order to improve the research study on the same topic in future, budget and time should be enhanced. Apart from that, this research study can act as sample for the future research work on the same topic. Focused concentration should be made on choosing sample size so that information that is more relevant can be collected regarding the research topic. Reference List Appelbaum, S.H., Karasek, R., Lapointe, F. and Quelch, K., 2015. Employee empowerment: factors affecting the consequent success or failure (Part II).Industrial and commercial training,47(1), pp.23-30. Augusto Felcio, J., Couto, E. and Caiado, J., 2014. Human capital, social capital and organizational performance.Management Decision,52(2), pp. Backhaus, K.B., 2014. Understanding Individual Differences in Employee Empowerment.Organization Management Journal,11(4), pp.211-211. Barrick, M.R., Thurgood, G.R., Smith, T.A. and Courtright, S.H., 2015. Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance.Academy of Management journal,58(1), pp.111-135. Camps, J. and Lunaà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ Arocas, R., 2012. A matter of learning: How human resources affect organizational performance.British Journal of Management,23(1), pp.1-21. Ccamatil.com. 2016.Coca-Cola Amatil | Home. [online] Available at: https://www.ccamatil.com/ [Accessed 21 Aug. 2016]. Chiang, C.F. and Hsieh, T.S., 2012. The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior.International Journal of Hospitality Management,31(1), pp.180-190. Dumay, J. and Cai, L., 2015. Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure: a critique.Journal of Intellectual Capital,16(1), pp.121-155. Elloy, D., 2012. Effects of ability utilization, job influence and organization commitment on employee empowerment: an empirical study.International Journal of Management,29(2), p.627. Farrokhyar, F., Amin, N., Dath, D., Bhandari, M., Kelly, S., Kolkin, A.M., Gill-Pottruff, C., Skot, M. and Reid, S., 2014. Impact of the surgical research methodology program on surgical residents research profiles.Journal of surgical education,71(4), pp.513-520. Fernandez, S. and Moldogaziev, T., 2013. Employee empowerment, employee attitudes, and performance: Testing a causal model.Public Administration Review,73(3), pp.490-506. Garca-Morales, V.J., Jimnez-Barrionuevo, M.M. and Gutirrez-Gutirrez, L., 2012. Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation.Journal of Business Research,65(7), pp.1040-1050. Gazzoli, G., Hancer, M. and Park, Y., 2012. Employee empowerment and customer orientation: Effects on workers' attitudes in restaurant organizations.International Journal of Hospitality Tourism Administration,13(1), pp.1-25. Ghosh, A.K., 2013. Employee empowerment: a strategic tool to obtain sustainable competitive advantage.International Journal of Management,30(3), p.95. Ghosh, A.K., 2013. Employee empowerment: a strategic tool to obtain sustainable competitive advantage.International Journal of Management,30(3), p.95. Hempel, P.S., Zhang, Z.X. and Han, Y., 2012. Team empowerment and the organizational context decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization.Journal of Management,38(2), pp.475-501. Hyland, P.K., Lee, R.A. and Mills, M.J., 2015. Mindfulness at work: A new approach to improving individual and organizational performance.Industrial and Organizational Psychology,8(04), pp.576-602. Kim, B., Losekoot, E. and Milne, S., 2013. Consequences of empowerment among restaurant servers: Helping behaviors and average check size.Management Decision,51(4), pp.781-794. Kim, T.Y. and Kim, M., 2013. Leaders moral competence and employee outcomes: The effects of psychological empowerment and personsupervisor fit.Journal of business ethics,112(1), pp.155-166. Kmieciak, R., Michna, A. and Meczynska, A., 2012. Innovativeness, empowerment and IT capability: evidence from SMEs.Industrial Management Data Systems,112(5), pp.707-728. Latif, M.S., Ahmad, M., Qasim, M., Mushtaq, M., Ferdoos, A. and Naeem, H., 2013. Impact of employees job satisfaction on organizational performance.European Journal of Business and Management,5(5), pp.166-171. Luoh, H.F., Tsaur, S.H. and Tang, Y.Y., 2014. Empowering employees: job standardization and innovative behavior.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,26(7), pp.1100-1117. MacDonald, C., 2012. Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research methodology option.The Canadian Journal of Action Research,13(2), pp.34-50. Manzoor, Q.A., 2012. Impact of employees motivation on organizational effectiveness.Business management and strategy,3(1), p.1. Maynard, M.T., Gilson, L.L. and Mathieu, J.E., 2012. Empowermentfad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research.Journal of Management,38(4), pp.1231-1281. Maynard, M.T., Mathieu, J.E., Gilson, L.L., OBoyle, E.H. and Cigularov, K.P., 2013. Drivers and outcomes of team psychological empowerment a meta-analytic review and model test.Organizational Psychology Review,3(2), pp.101-137. Men, L.R. and Stacks, D.W., 2013. The impact of leadership style and employee empowerment on perceived organizational reputation.Journal of Communication Management,17(2), pp.171-192. Michel, J.W., Kavanagh, M.J. and Tracey, J.B., 2013. Got support? The impact of supportive work practices on the perceptions, motivation, and behavior of customer-contact employees.Cornell Hospitality Quarterly,54(2), pp.161-173. Murari, K. and Gupta, K.S., 2012. Impact of servant leadership on employee empowerment.Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management,1(1), p.28. Namasivayam, K., Guchait, P. and Lei, P., 2014. The influence of leader empowering behaviors and employee psychological empowerment on customer satisfaction.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,26(1), pp.69-84. Pantouvakis, A. and Bouranta, N., 2013. The interrelationship between service features, job satisfaction and customer satisfaction: evidence from the transport sector.The TQM Journal,25(2), pp.186-201. Pentareddy, S. and Suganthi, L., 2015. Building affective commitment through job characteristics, leadership and empowerment.Journal of Management Organization,21(03), pp.307-320. Phipps, S.T., Prieto, L.C. and Ndinguri, E.N., 2013. Understanding the impact of employee involvement on organizational productivity: The moderating role of organizational commitment.Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict,17(2), p.107. Rahmdel, M. and Rahmdel, N., 2013. A study on relationship between empowering employees and social capital depreciation: A case study of treasury department.Management Science Letters,3(10), pp.2609-2614. Shahzad, F., Luqman, R.A., Khan, A.R. and Shabbir, L., 2012. Impact of organizational culture on organizational performance: an overview.Interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research in business,3(9), p.975. Shaw, J.D., Park, T.Y. and Kim, E., 2013. A resourceà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ based perspective on human capital losses, HRM investments, and organizational performance.Strategic management journal,34(5), pp.572-589. Shuck, B. and Reio, T.G., 2014. Employee engagement and well-being a moderation model and implications for practice.Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies,21(1), pp.43-58. Su, S., Baird, K. and Blair, B., 2013. Employee organizational commitment in the Australian public sector.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,24(2), pp.243-264. Sun, L.Y., Zhang, Z., Qi, J. and Chen, Z.X., 2012. Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation.The Leadership Quarterly,23(1), pp.55-65. Taylor, J., 2013. Goal setting in the Australian public service: Effects on psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior.Public Administration Review,73(3), pp.453-464. Taylor, J., 2013. Goal setting in the Australian public service: Effects on psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior.Public Administration Review,73(3), pp.453-464. Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J. and Van Veldhoven, M., 2012. Employee wellà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ being and the HRMorganizational performance relationship: a review of quantitative studies.International Journal of Management Reviews,14(4), pp.391-407. Wong, C.A. and Laschinger, H.K., 2013. Authentic leadership, performance, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of empowerment.Journal of advanced nursing,69(4), pp.947-959. Wu, I.L. and Chen, J.L., 2014. Knowledge management driven firm performance: The roles of business process capabilities and organizational learning.Journal of Knowledge Management,18(6), pp.1141-1164. Zeffane, R. and Al Zarooni, H.A.M., 2012. Empowerment, trust and commitment: The moderating role of work-unit centrality.International Journal of Management,29(1), p.332. Zeglat, D., Aljaber, M. and Alrawabdeh, W., 2014. Understating the impact of employee empowerment on customer-oriented behavior.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,6(1), p.55. Zhang, A.Y., Song, L.J., Tsui, A.S. and Fu, P.P., 2014. Employee responses to employmentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ relationship practices: The role of psychological empowerment and traditionality.Journal of Organizational Behavior,35(6), pp.809-830. Zhang, X. and Zhou, J., 2014. Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,124(2), pp.150-164. Zink, R.C., 2012. Sampling Methodology: Implications for Drawing Conclusions from Clinical Research Findings. InPrinciples of Research Methodology(pp. 197-205). Springer New York.